Why We Need Yet Another Twitter Tag
March 23, 2010 |
Poor moms.
Just when we tell them to get on Twitter, we make them learn our strange character codes that mean things on the service. DMs, RTs, @replies, #hashtags, ^codes… it’s not exactly the easiest learning curve.
That said, I think we need another tag.
Here’s an example. I follow Klout‘s Twitter account because I’m keen to learn when they have some news — an enhancement to their service, an announcement of downtime, that kind of thing. But Klout’s Twitter posts are almost all either @replies to people or automated robot posts. There’s got to be a way to filter those out… some kind of universal tag, like how the ^ tag became a way of indicating which person authored a tweet on a multi-author account.
And that tag should be [drum roll] the ~ symbol.
When used at the beginning of a tweet, ~ would indicate that that particular tweet was devoid of personal @messages and was a corporate announcement.
Okay, not really.
Clearly, there must be an alternative to this tongue-in-cheek proposal. Some companies have established different Twitter accounts — one for news, one for chatty things — but somehow that’s not the answer either.
Because filtering isn’t doing the job quote yet. So far, only Tweetdeck (to my knowledge) lets you filter out characters across a stream. For instance, you can (and I did) filter out RT from streams because I didn’t want to see any retweets. But that was for an entire stream, and not account-specific. And Tweetdeck forgets your filter as soon as you shut the program down. Hootsuite, the Twitter manager I use now, doesn’t even have that function (as far as I’ve been able to tell).
Is there a better solution? Am I missing something?
Leave a comment